ClickCease

(800) 561-4887

No Fee If We Don't Win

Safest Cities for Cyclists - Study

Which Cities Do Cyclists Hate Cycling in the Most? a Study Shows

Cycling has quickly replaced driving as the main means of transportation across the US since it is affordable, healthy, and ecologically beneficial. But even as millions of Americans enjoy their pedal-powered morning journeys, a noticeable air of anxiety hangs over many—especially those navigating busy city streets.

Everyday obstacles include squeezing past moving traffic, avoiding doors that unexpectedly open, and responding to drivers who abruptly change lanes. Three thousand cyclists were polled by the personal injury law firm Bisnar Chase about how safe or risky they felt while riding to work. On a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the safest feeling, cyclists evaluated their experiences.

Virginia Beach, No. 1: 9.4

Cycling is extremely safe in Virginia Beach, which had a score of 9.4 out of 10. This is partly a result of the city’s extensive bike lanes, defined trails, and amenities that cater to cyclists. Furthermore, this favorable attitude is further enhanced by ongoing awareness efforts and educational programs.

Raleigh, North Carolina, second, 8.9/10

Next comes Raleigh, where cyclists report feeling particularly safe there. This is due to the city’s dedication to a bike-friendly attitude, demonstrated by the network of bike lanes, trails, and facilities specifically designed for cyclists. Raleigh also continuously encourages motorists and bikers to respect one another through public awareness initiatives.

Third-place Kent, Washington: 8.8

Cycling in Kent is equally secure, placing third. This assurance is a result of the city’s thoughtful investments in bicycle infrastructure, including designated bike lanes, interconnecting trails, and well-marked route signs. Frequent conversations with supporters of cycling help the city’s strategy get better.

Syracuse, New York, third-placed: 8.8/10

Like Kent, Syracuse achieves its excellent score by consistently improving its bicycle infrastructure. This contains wide bike lanes, interconnected paths, and unmistakable route markers. Municipal governments also encourage motorists and bikers to communicate effectively.

8.8/10 Washington, D.C.

In Washington, D.C., cyclists have access to a comprehensive network of bike lanes and trails that spans more than 100 miles. The Anacostia River Trail and the C&O Canal Towpath are two noteworthy paths.

Cities where cyclists felt the most at risk were highlighted on the survey’s other end.

4.2/10 for Columbus, Georgia

Cyclists in Georgia give their city the worst score for safety. Their sense of safety is put to the test by the few bike lanes and frequently crowded, narrow roadways.

Memphis, Tennessee: 4.7/10

Cycling on the streets of Memphis is really difficult, mostly because of the numerous potholes. Safety issues are further exacerbated by the city’s congested pedestrian areas and high truck traffic.

4.7/10 for Huntsville, Alabama

Although having some bike lanes, Huntsville’s infrastructure does not provide as much support for bikers. Narrow streets and careless drivers are frequent worries made worse by the absence of bike safety instructions in the city.

Brian Chase of Bisnar Chase said, “It’s evident that infrastructure, education, and awareness play crucial roles in our attempts to understand the obstacles and pleasures of cycling in urban America. “Cities that encourage bicycle transportation not only foster healthier communities but also create safer and more peaceful conditions for all users of the road.”