After an Irvine personal injury accident, there may be some argument about who was actually at fault. The answer to that question will depend on the circumstances of the accident, and may actually hinge on which party is more believable to a judge or a jury. In some cases, there is no clear “at-fault” person, and then it may be up to a court to decide who bears the burden of fault for an Irvine personal injury accident.
While this type of situation is not common, it does happen. Suppose that you were driving through an intersection and were hit by another car. There were no witnesses to the accident, and the other driver claims you ran the red light. You claim that the accident was his fault, and that you had the right of way. In an argument like this, it is nearly impossible to determine who is actually telling the truth. The police who arrive at the accident scene may make a judgment as to who was at fault, but that judgment can be colored by the personalities of the drivers and other factors, including alcohol use. Assuming there is absolutely no way to tell who is at fault, both drivers may find themselves in a reciprocal lawsuit for damages. This means that both drivers sue each other, claiming that the other driver was at fault and should pay for damages. In such a case, it might come down to what a judge and jury believe on “preponderance of evidence.” In a civil trial, the jury or judge only has to be 51 percent convinced in order to find for a plaintiff or defendant, not convinced “beyond a reasonable doubt” as in criminal cases.
Scenarios like the one above do happen, but far more commonly it is clear who was at fault for an Irvine personal injury accident. Many times there are witnesses to a car accident, and someone is able to tell the police that the other driver was at fault in running the red light. For slip-and-fall accidents, there may be no witnesses, but if the floor is clearly wet, it is relatively certain that it caused the fall. For dog bite accidents, it is always assumed that the owner should have control of the animal. For every type of Irvine personal injury accident, there are similar protocols for determining fault.
Once fault is determined, your Irvine personal injury accident attorney will want to file a claim for damages. How much of this money you are able to collect will, again, depend on the circumstances of your accident, but a general rule is that you can collect all of your “real” expenses such as medical and property damage, and some of your “abstract” expenses such as pain and suffering. A good Irvine personal injury accident lawyer will be able to calculate how much your claim is worth and know when you have reached a good settlement figure in negotiations with the defendant or his or her insurance company.


SLS Consulting