Do I have a case for my auto defect?

Free Case Evaluation - Our full time staff is ready to evaluate your case submission and will respond in a timely manner.

Submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Request Your Free Consultation

Our team is standing by to help. Call us at (800) 561-4887 or complete this form to schedule a free consultation with us.

Submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Click for Your FREE Case Review Click for Your FREE Case Review

Motor Vehicle Defects Due to Defective Door Design In 1992 Dodge Ram Models

Most motor vehicle defect attorneys will agree that the 1992 Dodge Ram is a dangerous and defective car. In 1993, Charles Clark was driving his 1992 Dodge Ram pickup truck with his two nephews when a State Police cruiser near Route 25 in Kentucky hit him. The car collision to Clark's driver side front fender caused the cars to rotate and "side slap" after impact. Clark, who was not wearing a seat belt, was ejected from the truck, thrown onto the grass median and died six hours later from his personal injuries. Neither the police officer nor Clark's two passengers were seriously injured.

Clark's wife filed a products liability suit against Chrysler. Her motor vehicle defect attorneys alleged that Chrysler's lock latch on the Ram's doors was defectively designed, since it failed to hold the truck's door shut during the car accident.

Plaintiff's expert witnesses testified that the 1992 Dodge Ram did not have a state-of-the-art or state-of-the-industry lock latch. He referred to several other lock latch examples that were state-of-the-art at the time Clark's pickup truck was manufactured. His opinion that the lock latch was defective and unreasonably dangerous was based on his technical knowledge of automobile door latch systems, his extensive testing of door latch bypass failure, his familiarity with the Chrysler K latch and his examination of the latch in Clark's truck, as well as other K latches identical to the one involved in Clark's case.

Later, Clark's car accident reconstruction expert testified that the structure to which the truck's door attached when it closed, called a B-pillar, is the skeleton of the car and typically would be reinforced. He added that the Dodge Ram lock latch was 40 years out of date and that the B-pillar was defectively designed because it was a single piece of sheet metal that had not been shaped and welded into a square box to provide structure, as was typical in the industry.

B-pillar twist-out was a known failure in the automobile industry. General Motors submitted a twist-out test procedure to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) for informational purposes. The procedure was also made available to other car manufacturers, including Chrysler. Despite being aware that General Motors was testing its B-pillars for twist-out, Chrysler did not choose to test its latches for twist-out failure. Other cars at the time the Dodge Ram was manufactured, including a Toyota pickup, a 1991 Nissan, and a 1989 Ford, had "boxed" B-pillars that were reinforced in the area of the striker. Regrettably, Chrysler's design did not utilize the box-within-a-box design found in the other cars--a design that could have prevented the twist-out and kept the Ram's doors shut in this car accident.

The jury found that Chrysler and Clark were each 50 percent at fault--Chrysler for its defective Dodge Ram car latch design and Clark for failing to "buckle up." Consequently, the jury's $471,258 compensatory award was cut in half in the judgment for Clark, while its $3 million in punitive damages stood. In its appeal to the Sixth Circuit Court, Chrysler lost its bid to overturn the jury verdict.

"This is another example of an automaker failing to correct known safety issues when a simple, inexpensive solution is readily available," observed Brian Chase of the nationally recognized motor vehicle defects law firm of Bisnar Chase Personal Injury Attorneys. "Mrs. Clark's action of taking Chrysler to court is an example of our justice system at work. The jury's award is America's message to Chrysler that their failure to act was not acceptable. Hopefully, this lawsuit will help convince Chrysler to make safety a higher priority in the design of their cars. With the people of America bailing out Chrysler to the tune of billions of dollars, Chrysler has a moral duty to build more crashworthy cars for Americans."

If you or a loved one has suffered serious injuries as the result of a defective auto part or vehicle, contact the experienced California auto products liability attorneys at Bisnar Chase Personal Injury Attorneys for a free consultation. We will use our extensive knowledge and resources to achieve the best possible results for you and your family.

Was This Page Helpful? Yes | No