Request Your Free Consultation

Our team is standing by to help. Call us at (800) 561-4887 or complete this form to schedule a free consultation with us.

Submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Click for Your FREE Case Review Click for Your FREE Case Review

GreatCall, Inc.; Best Buy Co., Inc.

Defendant Name: SCOTT BARNES, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated

Case Number: 2:19-cv-04457-JFW-GJS

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION

Practice Area: Class Action

Status: Active; Jury Trial Demanded

Date Filed: 05/22/2019

Documents: Original Complaint (PDF)

Attorneys Involved: Brian Chase, Jerusalem Beligan, Ian M. Silvers

Think you have a case? Contact us using the form to the right to have a class action specialist contact you.

Details of the Defective Medical Device Case

Plaintiff Scott Barnes (“Plaintiff”), individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, bring this class action against Defendants GreatCall, Inc., Best Buy, Co., Inc. and DOES 1 to 10 (collectively referred to herein as “Defendants”), and in support thereof the following, based upon personal information, investigation of his counsel, and upon information and belief as to all other allegations.

Defendants are the leading provider of connected health and personal emergency response services to the aging population, with more than 900,000 paying subscribers. Defendants introduced the new Lively Mobile Plus (the “Defective Medical Alert Device”) and advertised it as “the highest standard in medical alerts.” Defendants further represent on their website that the Defective Medical Alert Device will provide “help anytime, anywhere, 24/7".

The Defective Medical Alert Device fails to provide what was promised to consumers

The Defective Medical Alert Device is defective in that the fall detection and GPS does not function and fails to provide emergency services when activated (the “Defect”); thus, placing consumers—predominantly elderly and disabled persons who are relying on the Defective Medical Alert Device—at great risk of serious injuries, including death if emergency services either arrive late or are never alerted.

CLASS ACTION ALLEGATIONS

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, Plaintiff brings this lawsuit on behalf of himself and all similarly situated individuals. Plaintiff seeks to represent the following nationwide class: All persons in California and throughout the United States who purchased one or more of the Defective Medical Alert Devices (the “Class”).


Was This Page Helpful? Yes | No

See All Ratings And Awards

Have a question that wasn't answered here?

Call Us!

(800) 561-4887

Fill Out Our

Contact Form