Ford Vehicle Recall

DEMAND FOR FORD VEHICLE RECALL IS MADE. DEFECTIVE SEATBELTS CAUSE HIDDEN DANGER, SAY ATTORNEYS IN DEATH CASE.

(Newport Beach, California) The death of a 14 year-old girl, who was wearing her seatbelt at the time of the rollover of her family's 1992 Ford Explorer, has prompted a new national outcry for a recall of some of the auto-maker's U.S. vehicles to replace defective seatbelt buckles that have been illegal in European vehicles for the past 30 years.

"It continues to amaze me that U.S. companies produce a knowingly defective product in the United States, that they do not market abroad - in this instance, the Ford Explorer," said Brian Chase, of BISNAR & CHASE in Orange County California, the attorneys who handled a multi-million dollar lawsuit against Ford which reached final, confidential settlement early this year. "The case against TRW, the manufacturer of the defective buckle, resolved on the first day of trial for a substantial confidential amount, well in excess of their offer of settlement."

The unexpected release of a side-release style seat belt buckle during the 1997 accident resulted in severe spinal injuries to Ashley Liebold, who was rendered a paraplegic in the crash and later died. Attorneys in the case say there have been thousands of injuries from these defective seat belt buckles and there are many more potential accidents waiting to happen.

"The tragedy here is that she was wearing her seat belt. Each of us has the right to know - when we buckle up, or when our children do -- that the buckle will stay buckled. But that wasn't the case. Ford knew it had a defective seatbelt latch and still let the public use them. It cost Ashley her life. Our hope is to save additional lives," says Chase.

FALSE LATCHING OF SEATBELTS

Investigation of over 300,000 documents and 40 depositions by the attorneys for Liebold uncovered that a certain type of seatbelt, specifically called "RCF-67" or "Type I" side release buckle is inherently prone to false latching by design. False latching occurs when the tongue of the seatbelt is inserted into the buckle, but the buckle does not fully engage, leaving the passenger to believe that they are buckled in when they are not. Further investigation by the law firm BISNAR & CHASE, indicated that Ford was aware of the problem and had originally corrected it --- but later chose to implement use of the "RCF-67" design to save money - approximately $1.90 per vehicle according to the attorneys.

WHICH FORD VEHICLES FEATURE THE RCF-67?

According to Chase, almost all makes and models of Ford vehicles sold in the United States before 1996 utilized the "RCF 67" buckle and a few current models still do, however, the buckle's defect of false latching becomes more problematic in Ford vans, trucks and SUVs.

"There may be many others who have been injured or even killed by this problem but never reported it - who would possibly imagine that the part in the car intended to save your life --- might cost you your life?" said John Bisnar. "We imagine that during this recall effort we will discover many other instances that the public is not aware of," he said.

BISNAR & CHASE will be working closely to report additional findings to the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration and are requesting a full Federal Government recall of the defective seatbelt latches.

(click on icons for more information)

Los Angeles Defective Seat Belt Lawyers Disclaimer: The personal injury, wrongful death, dog bites, nursing home negligence, amusement park accidents, negligence, product liability or other legal information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer or attorney client relationship. Any results set forth here were dependent on the facts of that case and the results will differ from case to case. Please contact a personal injury lawyer or wrongful death attorney at one of our Southern California law firm offices located in Los Angeles County, Orange County, San Diego, Riverside and San Bernardino. This web site is not intended to solicit clients for matters outside of the State of California.

Don't Wait Until It's Too Late: California Statutes of Limitations

Governmental Claim - 6 months | Personal Injury - 2 years | Minor's Personal Injury - 2 years after minor's 18th birthday | Professional Negligence: 1 Year

The BISNAR | CHASE Personal Injury Attorneys serve all of California, including Orange County, Los Angeles County, Riverside County, San Bernardino County, Ventura County, San Diego County and San Francisco County. We serve Newport Beach, Anaheim, Buena Park, Costa Mesa, Fullerton, Garden Grove, Huntington Beach, Irvine, Lake Forest, Orange, Santa Ana, Tustin, Westminster, Los Angeles, Torrance, West Covina, San Francisco, Riverside, San Bernardino, Victorville, Ventura and San Diego. In addition, we represent clients in other states through our associations with local law firms. Through the local firm, we will be admitted to practice law in their state, pro hac vice, meaning "for this particular occasion." When in our client's interest, we employ the local law firm (at no additional cost to our client) to assist us with routine court appearances and discovery proceedings to more efficiently pursue our client's cause.

©1999- BISNAR | CHASE LLP Personal Injury Lawyers - All rights reserved. Locations: Orange County Personal Injury Lawyers - 1301 Dove St., Suite 120, Newport Beach, CA 92660; Los Angeles Personal Injury Lawyers - 1111 South Grand Ave., Suite 101, Los Angeles, CA 90015; San Francisco Personal Injury Lawyers - 5139 Geary Boulevard, San Francisco, CA 92118

Website, SEO and Legal Internet Marketing by  SLS Consulting

Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Sitemap | Abogados para Accidentes de Auto - Se Habla Español

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

Google Analytics Alternative