En Español

Defective Auto Product: 1986 Plymouth Voyager Brake Design Defect

Most auto product liability lawyers will admit that a defective auto product is a danger to the vehicle occupants and other drivers on the road. In 1990, Paul Santos was driving his 1986 Plymouth Voyager minivan in New Hampshire. Santos, his wife, and their three children were returning to Belmont from a ski trip in Canada. When Santos applied the brakes after approaching slowed traffic, the rear of the minivan slid to the right, swerved into an oncoming lane and was broadsided by a Ford Bronco. Santos was injured, but sadly, his wife and three children died as a result of the car accident.

Santos subsequently filed a lawsuit against Chrysler. His defective product attorney produced expert testimony that the car accident was caused by premature and unanticipated rear-wheel lockup. They alleged that premature rear-wheel lockup was a design defect caused by one or more design defects that existed or could have occurred in the minivan's brake system. Chrysler contended that the car crash was caused by driver error in hazardous winter weather.

Plaintiffs produced several other witnesses who described the rear ends of their minivans skidding or swerving following hard application of the brakes. Although not all the witnesses specifically stated that their wheels "locked up," the jury could infer that the braking system was essentially the same in all the minivans. All the witnesses testified to incidents on wet roads. Although Santos' car accident occurred in snowy conditions, most of the snow had been cleared and the road was only wet.

In Chrysler's view, because the witnesses were ordinary drivers, they were incapable of identifying premature wheel-rear lockup. Over Chrysler's objection, the judge admitted evidence of recalls of minivans from the 1984 and 1985 model years.

"These recalls called for the installation of a shield over the height sensing proportioning valve (HSPV)," noted nationally recognized auto defects attorney, John Bisnar. "The recall letter stated that the shield was necessary to keep small stone's from becoming entrapped in the HSPV, and that an HSPV so contaminated could increase stopping distances during hard braking when the minivan was lightly loaded."

Santos' attorneys introduced the recalls to show that Chrysler was on notice that the HSPV could not be relied on to prevent premature rear-wheel lockup. Further evidence suggested that Chrysler was also concerned about snow contamination and rear-wheel skid.

A memo from a Chrysler braking engineer written shortly before he retired reported rear-brake "burn up" and rear-wheel skid from leased vehicles, endurance vehicles, taxicabs, passenger vehicles, and station wagons -- but not minivans, which had not yet been developed. He concluded that these Chrysler vehicles suffered from premature rear-wheel skid after a short period of use. This tendency was accompanied by increased efficiency and rapid wear of the vehicles' rear brake linings. This widespread tendency to experience rear-wheel skid because of over-efficient rear brake linings, combined with the fact that the brake linings in Santos minivan were excessively worn, convinced the jury that Chrysler was aware of the tendency of the rear wheels of its vehicles to lockup prematurely due to over-efficient rear brake linings.

The Massachusetts Supreme Court therefore upheld a lower court finding and ordered DaimlerChrysler to pay $19.2 million in damages to Paul Santos.

"Under unimaginable emotional pain, Mr. Santos chose to confront a giant car maker in court," observed Brian Chase of the nationally recognized Bisnar Chase Personal Injury Attorneys product liability law firm. "Holding Chrysler accountable for a preventable tragedy is an act of courage and should be commended. Our hope is that these lawsuits, and the many lawsuits we have filed against Chrysler and other car makers will convince them to design safer braking systems and prevent others from being seriously injured or killed."

If you or a loved one has suffered serious injuries as the result of a defective auto part or vehicle, contact the experienced California auto products liability attorneys at Bisnar Chase Personal Injury Attorneys for a free consultation. We will use our extensive knowledge and resources to achieve the best possible results for you and your family.

Have a question that wasn't answered here?

(800) 561-4887

Was This Page Helpful? Yes | No

Client Reviews of Bisnar Chase

“My sister in law referred me to Bisnar Chase after I was rear ended on the 405 in January. They went over everything with me for best and worst case scenarios of my car accident claim. I fully knew what to expect and was informed every step of the way. That was a major factor to me! In addition to my settlement which I was really happy with, I couldn't believe how great their whole staff treated me. I really felt like "me" as a person mattered a lot to them. Would highly recommend!”

by Shannon F.

reviewed at Yelp

“While my wrongful death case is still being decided I really love how this firm cares for the people they represent I feel so much better after talking with Doug on a monthly basis he reassures me things will be okay. Looking for to ending this real soon but I am very thankful to Bisnar and Chase for all they do!”

by Karla Hawley

reviewed at Facebook

“I cannot speak highly enough of Bisnar and Chase. They represented us when we were hit by a government drunk driver on base while my husband was enlisted in April 2010 and stayed diligent throughout our long federal case. They handled everything start to finish and held our hands the whole way!”

by Alexis Ashburn

reviewed at Facebook

See All Ratings And Awards

The BISNAR CHASE Difference

  • “I was in a serious auto accident when I was in law school. I had to hire a personal injury attorney and had a really bad experience.”

    John Bisnar

    on what made him want to become a personal injury attorney

  • “If you hire Bisnar | Chase and we don't recover money for you in your case, you owe us absolutely nothing.”

    Brian Chase

    on whether or not you would owe money if your case was lost

  • “Whatever the philosphy of the management is, is going to be carried through by the employees and it’s going to reflect on the experience the clients have.”

    John Bisnar

    on his philosophy on running a law firm

  • “The insurance companies are going to be investigating that accident the day it happens. You need to have a lawyer on your side the day it happens as well.”

    Brian Chase

    on when you should contact an attorney

  • “The first thing we want to do with our clients is to relieve the stress. Make them feel comfortable. Treat them as an honored guest.”

    John Bisnar

    on how he would define superior client representation

  • “It's hard to answer that question right up front without a thorough analysis. What I can guarantee you is, with the resources of Bisnar | Chase we will maximize the value of your case.”

    Brian Chase

    on what your case is worth

Bisnar Chase Personal Injury Attorneys
1301 Dove St #120
Newport Beach, CA 92660

local: (949) 203-3814
Get Directions

California Personal Injury Blog