En Español

Category: Product Recall

Los Angeles Woman Sues McDonald’s Over Hot Coffee

By Brian Chase on January 15, 2014 - No comments

Woman who sued McDonalds in the 90s over hot coffee Twenty years after a jury awarded a landmark $2.9 million to a woman who was badly burned by hot McDonald’s coffee in Albuquerque, a Los Angeles woman has filed a personal injury lawsuit against the Golden Arches saying she suffered burn injuries after hot coffee spilled on her at one of the fast food chain’s restaurants.

In the New Mexico case, the award was reduced to $640,000 and the case was later settled out of court for an undisclosed amount. That case also drew national and international attention from critics who called it a “frivolous” lawsuit although the woman suffered third-degree burns and had to undergo skin graft surgery. The case is still cited by advocates for tort reform. …Read the rest »

Posted in: Product Liability


Is Robotic Surgery the Right Path for You?

By Brian Chase on December 14, 2013 - No comments

using robots for surgeryRobotic surgery in the United States became available to the public more than 20 years ago, in 1992, when a 64-year-old man had his hip successfully replace with the help of a machine called Robodoc.

However, it wasn’t until 2000 that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved use of the da Vinci robotic system for a large group of minimally invasive procedures. This is when robotic surgery really started gaining popularity.

Marketing Hype

Over the last 10 years, nearly 2,000 surgical robots have been sold in the United States and the number of robotic procedures for everything from head and neck surgery to hysterectomies has soared by 30 percent each year. It seems that this soaring in popularity has been due to aggressive marketing tactics playing up the robot’s “wow” factor rather than a solid track record of safety and effectiveness.

Billboards and television commercials have cracked up these robotic systems to be more high-tech and cutting edge than they really are, safety experts say. However, what we have learned from several sources including the FDA is that these robots may not be living up to their promise. Researchers at Johns Hopkins say that while some people may benefit from robotic surgery, it may actually end up hurting others.

Making the Right Decision

So how do you determine if robotic surgery is right for you? Here are a few tips:

• Do not believe everything you see or hear. Ignore the hype. According to a 2011 Johns Hopkins study, hospital websites often cite studies comparing robotic surgery with open surgery instead of with minimally invasive procedures. Many claims with regard to safety and effectiveness can also be misleading.
• Carefully consider your options. Think twice about going in for robotic surgery for routine procedures such as hernia surgery, appendix removal or gallbladder removal. However, you may want to consider it for complex surgeries such as cancer surgery, head and neck tumors and other procedures where there is no minimally invasive option.
• It is important to ask questions before you go in for surgery. Some patients are not even informed that a robot will be used. If you are scheduled for surgery, ask questions about what procedures will be used.
• Make sure that you select the right doctor if you are going in for robotic surgery. Find out about his or her experience, number of procedures performed using a robot and his or her success rate.
• Talk to others you know who may have had the surgery or visit support groups.

It is important that all patients have the facts they need to make informed choices about their health. It is important for consumers to weigh all the positives and negatives of robotic surgery. There’s been recent talk of medical malpractice cases looming over the robotic surgery tool and it’s still early to determine if there will be legal cases surrounding robotic surgery and it’s level of safety.

Posted in: Product Liability


Toyota Issues Recall Again after Bungling Initial Fix

By Brian Chase on September 16, 2013 - No comments

Toyota Motor Corp. is recalling more than 780,000 RAV4 and Lexus HS250h vehicles for the second time after a problem with the suspension that was not properly fixed the first time. According to a Reuters news report, the SUVs and luxury sedans were initially recalled in August 2012 for rear tie rods, a suspension component, that could fail and cause drivers to lose control of their vehicles. The Japanese automaker found out that some dealer mechanics did not correctly perform the repairs.


Automaker Finds Fixes Inadequate

Toyota apparently got reports from dealers that some vehicles experienced symptoms of the recalled condition even after being inspected or repaired. After an investigation Toyota determined that some inspections were not sufficient and that portions of the repair procedure may not have been performed correctly. …Read the rest »

Posted in: Product Liability


Ford Recalls Sedans for Steering Issues

By Brian Chase on September 9, 2013 - No comments

ford recallFord is issuing a product defect recall for 355,000 sedans for corrosion issues that could lead to loss of steering. According to a report in The Car Connection, a notice on the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s (NHTSA) web site says that the vehicles involved in the recall are certain 2005 to 2011 Ford Crown Victoria, Mercury Grand Marquis and Lincoln Town Car sedans. The recalled vehicles include Crown Victoria Police Interceptor units. Affected vehicles are currently registered or were originally sold in 22 states. However, these vehicles may be sold in other states as well. …Read the rest »

Posted in: Product Recall


Toyota Recalls Vehicles for Stalling Problems

By Brian Chase on September 9, 2013 - No comments

toyota recall
Toyota announced two separate auto defect recalls to address stalling issues. According to a CNN news report, the recalls cover a total of 369,000 Toyota vehicles worldwide including 235,000 in the United States. The larger recall includes Highlander Hybrid models produced between 2006 and 2010 and Lexus RX 400h vehicles made from 2006 to 2008. In those SUVs, the transistors in the hybrid system can overheat, triggering a warning that in some cases can result in the vehicle unexpectedly stopping while in operation.

The second recall includes Lexus IS 350, IS 350C and GS 350 vehicles made between 2006 and 2011. These vehicles can also unexpectedly stop while on the road due to bolts in the variable valve timing control device coming loose. When the recall starts, owners of vehicles covered in this recall will be notified via mail.

Toyota Recalls

These safety defect recalls are yet another blow to Toyota’s reputation for quality and reliability. In June, Toyota announced that it was recalling nearly a quarter of a million Prius and Lexus hybrids because of a braking problem. Also, last October, the company announced a recall of 7.43 million cars due to a power window problem that posed a fire hazard. In April, the Japanese automaker recalled about 1.7 million cars due to airbag defects. Toyota’s largest and most-publicized recall came in 2009 and 2010 when more than 8 million units were recalled for sticky gas pedals and faulty floor mats that could cause sudden or unintended acceleration.

Auto Product Liability Issues

Defective parts in vehicles can be extremely dangerous because they increase the risk of a crash and serious injury or even death. In this particular case, both recalls involve vehicles that could suddenly and unexpectedly come to a stop when the vehicle is in motion. This could result in a collision.

If you or a loved one has been injured due to a defective auto, it would be in your best interests to contact an experienced auto product liability lawyer who can independently investigate the issue and ensure that the negligent manufacturers are held liable. It is crucial that you preserve the vehicle so it can be examined thoroughly by an expert for any evidence of malfunctions and flaws. The best auto defect law firms will always offer a free consultation and comprehensive case evaluation to injured victims and their families.

Posted in: Product Recall


Ladybug-Themed Kids’ Furniture Recalled for Excessive Lead Paint

By Brian Chase on August 15, 2013 - No comments

ladybug furniture recallFar East Brokers, a Florida-based company, has issued a product defect recall for its ladybug-themed kids’ outdoor furniture due to violation of U.S. lead paint standards. According to a safety alert issued by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), the red surface paint on the furniture contains excessive levels of lead, which is a violation of the federal lead paint standard. The products were manufactured in China and were sold nationwide through wholesale distributors, grocery and drug stores from January to May for between $10 and $50.

The recall involves red ladybug-themed kids’ metal-framed outdoor furniture sold under the Leisure Way brand. The 14,000 items covered under this recall have large ladybug images on the fabric and include camp chairs, folding chairs, moon chairs, double-seat swing chairs and a patio set that includes two chairs, a table and an umbrella. Anyone who owns these products is asked to take the furniture away from children and return them to the place of purchase for a full refund. For more information, please contact the manufacturer at 1-888-753-9040 or visit www.fareastbrokers.com. …Read the rest »

Posted in: Product Recall


Share this:

See All Awards, Ratings and Reviews

The BISNAR | CHASE Difference

  • “I went to law school knowing I wanted to be a personal injury attorney. I wanted my life’s work to have a positive impact on other people’s lives.”

    Brian Chase

    on what made him want to become a personal injury attorney

  • “I was in a serious auto accident when I was in law school. I had to hire a personal injury attorney and had a really bad experience.”

    John Bisnar

    on what made him want to become a personal injury attorney

  • “Everybody either drives in a car or rides in a car, so when I do the auto defect cases I really feel like I’m making the world safer by making vehicles safer.”

    Brian Chase

    on why he focuses on auto defect cases

  • “Whatever the philosphy of the management is, is going to be carried through by the employees and it’s going to reflect on the experience the clients have.”

    John Bisnar

    on his philosophy on running a law firm

  • “Corporate greed is a reality in our world and I see it time and time again. Especially, with the auto defect cases we focus on.”

    Brian Chase

    on corporate greed and how it affects the consumer

  • “The first thing we want to do with our clients is to relieve the stress. Make them feel comfortable. Treat them as an honored guest.”

    John Bisnar

    on how he would define superior client representation

  • “There are many, many defects in vehicles that can lead to life or death that could be fixed with a mere $40-$50 [on the assembly line].”

    Brian Chase

    on the shocking facts about the vehicles we drive

  • “You are dealing with people who are seriously injured or have lost a family member...Compassion is understanding someone else’s situation.”

    John Bisnar

    on the role compassion plays in his profession

  • “I’m convinced, because of all the lawsuits...the auto industry finally found out it was cheaper to fix the problem than to keep paying in the litigation.”

    Brian Chase

    on making the world a safer place

  • “...if [manufacturers] build a dangerous product and someone is seriously injured from that, some personal inury lawyer is going to call them on the carpet about it.”

    John Bisnar

    on how Bisnar | Chase has helped make the world a better place

  • “When you have a client come in that’s in a wheelchair...or you meet a wife who has lost their husband or they’ve lost their child, it’s diffucult not to get emotionally involved.”

    Brian Chase

    on the biggest challenges he faces as a personal injury lawyer

  • “I bring in the best employees that I can and I want them to have a workplace that is condusive to them doing their best work.”

    John Bisnar

    on the work environment created at Bisnar | Chase

  • “My motivation of going to law school to have my life’s work help other people...when I see that come to fruition, I’m very pleased and very happy with that.”

    Brian Chase

    on the accomplishments he is most proud of

  • “...it is part of our civic responsibility and it is our great fortune to be in a position to be able to help support our community...”

    John Bisnar

    on the importance of giving back to the community

  • “I was always jealous of doctors. They get to save lives and they get to heal. I don’t get to do that but I get to have a very big impact on another person’s life...”

    Brian Chase

    on the greatest satisfaction derived from his work

  • “Seeing the growth of my employees, seeing them mature professionally, personally, and grow into the great professionals they have become is tremendous.”

    John Bisnar

    on the greatest satisfaction derived from his work

  • “I’m the president-elect this year and I’ll be the president next year of the Consumer Advocate Attorneys of California and I find that to be a rewarding thing...”

    Brian Chase

    on being an advocate for the people of California

  • “There’s going to people that you meet, that you can mentor...You can make a difference in their lives, you can make a difference in their client’s lives.”

    John Bisnar

    on mentoring young attorneys

  • “We try to figure out how we can help [our clients] get through what they’re going through emotionally. Because just getting them compensated is only part of the job.”

    Brian Chase

    on the role compassion plays in his profession

  • “The Lakers have always been a winning organization, a class organization. I’ve used the Lakers as kind of a model for how to run my practice as well.”

    John Bisnar

    on his passions in life

Bisnar | Chase • 1301 Dove St #120
Newport Beach, CA 92660
local: (949) 203-3814
Get Directions

California Personal Injury Blog

28 Injured In Metrolink Train Accident In Oxnard

More than two dozen people were injured, four critically, in a Metrolink train accident in Ventura County the morning of February 24, 2015. According to an NBC news report, the Metrolink train was on

read article

Government To Revise Nursing Home Compare Rating System

The federal government has revised how it will evaluate nursing homes in a way that makes it tougher for these care facilities to receive top scores. According to news reports, Medicare’s

read article

Feds Hit Takata With Daily Fine On Airbag Probe

Federal auto safety regulators have slapped Takata Corporation with a $14,000 per-day fine for failing to properly cooperate with an investigation of its faulty airbags. According to a Reuters news

read article


Copyright & Disclaimer

Disclaimer: The legal information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice, nor the formation of an attorney-client relationship. Any results set forth here were dependent on the facts of that case and the results will differ from case to case.

Bisnar Chase serves all of California. In addition, we represent clients in other states through our associations with local law firms. Through the local firm, we will be admitted to practice law in their state, pro hac vice, meaning "for this particular occasion." When in our client's interest, we employ the local law firm (at no additional cost to our client) to assist us with routine court appearances and discovery proceedings to more efficiently pursue our client's cause.

Copyright © 1999- Bisnar Chase Personal Injury Attorneys - All rights reserved.

SLS Consulting