En Español

Auto Defect Case Press Releases

Auto Defects Lawyers File Wrongful Death Action Against Toyota

Newport Beach, CA (PRWEB) August 5, 2009

The California personal injury attorneys of Bisnar Chase (www.BestAttorney.com) have filed a wrongful death lawsuit against Toyota Corporation and Courtesy Toyota of Brandon, Florida (case #YC060158). The suit alleges that the 1998 Toyota 4Runner SUV manufactured by Toyota and sold by Courtesy Toyota failed to properly protect Elisa Obediente during a May 2009 rollover crash that ultimately caused her demise. The action was brought against the defendants by Julio Obediente (Elisa's husband) and their surviving children (Cesar, Julio Jr., Rafael and Sandra Duffau).

Myriad of Defects Alleged

The rollover occurred when Elisa lost control of the 4Runner due to a dynamic over steer as she attempted to avoid another vehicle during a lane change. "We're alleging that the lateral instability of the 4Runner made it impossible to regain control of the SUV by anyone but a professional driver," said John Bisnar of the Bisnar Chase auto defects law firm. "Our allegations include that this SUV's high center of gravity and narrow track width, as well as the 4Runner's A, B, C and D pillars, windshield headers and roof rails, which lacked the strength to withstand the SUV's weight while inverted. We're saying these vehicle defects resulted in the roof crushing inward, partially ejecting Elisa, causing her to be fatally injured."

Over Steer Problem Correctable with Existing Low-Cost Technology

The 4Runner did not have Electronic Stability Control (ESC) technology, which plaintiff's lawyers contend would have sensed the vehicle's over steer and automatically adjusted the brakes and throttle to allow Elisa to maintain control during the foreseeable traffic condition. ESC technology was available for the Toyota 4Runner in 1995 at relatively low extra cost to Toyota, and plaintiff's lawyers contend that it should have been installed in a vehicle with such instability and rollover propensities.

4Runner Listed as Number Two Most Likely to Roll Over

Prior to its manufacture, the 4Runner was listed as the number two most likely vehicle in its class to roll over, according to a five-state study undertaken by the Federal Registry. In fact, the 4Runner obtained 2-wheel lift from steering inputs alone on Toyota's own in-house "fish-hook" turn tests, with rollover and two-wheel tipping occurring at speeds as low as 32 miles per hour. Plaintiffs allege that Toyota failed to disclose results of subsequent tests that revealed the 4Runner's propensity for rollovers. Also alleged is that Toyota encouraged customers to upgrade to a larger wheel and tire package that would further exacerbate the 4Runner's propensity to roll over.

Roof Crush Problem Ignored

Plaintiffs contend that, since 1968,Toyota Corporation and Courtesy Toyota knew of crash data results, in-house testing, field service reports and published studies, and that Toyota SUVs like the 4Runner were susceptible to roof crush forces that could cause serious and substantial head and neck injuries during a rollover.

In 1984 and 1990, Toyota Corporation and Courtesy Toyota published, participated or received crash dummy specifications for roof crush injury forces. Plaintiffs allege that these specifications were used to establish an inaccurate set of rollover crush force minimums. They further allege that the specifications led the public and U.S. regulatory bodies to believe that the A-pillars/windshield headers and roof rails of Toyota SUVs--including the 4Runner--had been strengthened to withstand higher crush forces.

"We're saying that Toyota knew these specifications were only half of the roof crush impact forces the 4Runner sustained in these rollover accidents," noted John Bisnar. "Our case alleges that Toyota knew these vehicles, used as intended, might expose the public to death and serious injuries; furthermore, they falsified test results, ignored and suppressed data and falsely mischaracterized adverse test data, which they knew would prove their SUVs were defective."

An Issue of Cost and Possible Recall by NHTSA

Plaintiffs also allege that Toyota Corporation and Courtesy Toyota were aware that the use of complete sections, thicker steel and stronger materials in A-pillars/windshield headers and roof rails could have prevented deaths and serious injuries in rollover car accidents, and that these improvement could have been incorporated in the 4Runner for only a small extra expense. Taking this action, plaintiffs maintain, would have resulted in disclosures leading to an expensive recall campaign by the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration.

Confusing Advertising and Marketing

"The 4Runner's advertising, marketing, and even its owner's manual implied that their third generation SUV featured advanced engineering and quality construction," noted John Bisnar. "We're saying, just the opposite is true; the 4Runner lacked a myriad of safety features that made it unsafe in a foreseeable rollover accident, one that would occur during everyday collision avoidance maneuvers performed by unprofessional drivers."

The plaintiffs seek compensation for wrongful death, loss of financial support and love, care companionship, comfort, solace and moral support of a lost wife and mother.

About Bisnar Chase

Bisnar Chase California Auto Defect Attorneys represent people throughout the country who have been very seriously injured or lost a family member due to motor vehicle defects. The law firm has won a variety of challenging auto defect cases against General Motors, Ford Motor Co., Chrysler and many of the foreign manufacturers. For more information, read "Still Unsafe At Any Speed: Auto Defects That Cause Wrongful Deaths and Catastrophic Injuries" by Brian Chase.

Have a question that wasn't answered here?

(800) 561-4887

Was This Page Helpful? Yes | No

Client Reviews of Bisnar Chase

“Great people in this office, everyone was really helpful explaining everything. I was referred by my aunt for my car accident in October and the case went pretty fast. No problems and very professional. I was kept in the loop thru [sic] the whole process and was able to get a better settlement than my insurance company said I would. I cant really compare them to other law firms because it was the first time I had to use an attorney, but my bad experience with the car accident was handled as good as I could have hoped.”

by Paige Montgomery

reviewed at Google+

“Undoubtedly the best firm I've ever encountered. It's not a huge firm, as I only worked with a few people, but it felt like a real place where work gets done. I never felt like a "little person," as my case wasn't small, but it wasn't huge either. I know lawyers have gotten a bad rap, but these guys bring the word classy back to law. I definitely can recommend these guys.”

by Clark G.

reviewed at Yelp

“This was not my first accident, Bisnar Chase handled what I definitely didn't want to deal with. Thank you for your professionalism, and for getting my case settled.”

by Krystal Mead

reviewed at Facebook

See All Ratings And Awards

The BISNAR CHASE Difference

  • “I was in a serious auto accident when I was in law school. I had to hire a personal injury attorney and had a really bad experience.”

    John Bisnar

    on what made him want to become a personal injury attorney

  • “If you hire Bisnar | Chase and we don't recover money for you in your case, you owe us absolutely nothing.”

    Brian Chase

    on whether or not you would owe money if your case was lost

  • “Whatever the philosphy of the management is, is going to be carried through by the employees and it’s going to reflect on the experience the clients have.”

    John Bisnar

    on his philosophy on running a law firm

  • “The insurance companies are going to be investigating that accident the day it happens. You need to have a lawyer on your side the day it happens as well.”

    Brian Chase

    on when you should contact an attorney

  • “The first thing we want to do with our clients is to relieve the stress. Make them feel comfortable. Treat them as an honored guest.”

    John Bisnar

    on how he would define superior client representation

  • “It's hard to answer that question right up front without a thorough analysis. What I can guarantee you is, with the resources of Bisnar | Chase we will maximize the value of your case.”

    Brian Chase

    on what your case is worth

Bisnar Chase Personal Injury Attorneys
1301 Dove St #120
Newport Beach, CA 92660

local: (949) 203-3814
Get Directions

California Personal Injury Blog