Motor Vehicle Defects: 1996 Ford Crown Victoria's Roof Proves Not Crashworthy

Most motor vehicle defect attorneys will agree that a car's roof strength is import to the safety of its passengers. U.S. Army Major Barry Muth was sitting in the front passenger seat of a 1996 Ford Crown Victoria when the car's driver, a fellow Army officer on duty in Saudi Arabia, lost control and ran into a concrete barrier separating the two sides of the road. The car, which was traveling about 10 mph above the 48 mph speed limit, slid along the barrier and ultimately flipped onto its roof, which collapsed 12 to 15 inches.

Muth, now 46, was left a paraplegic by the 1999 car accident. The driver testified that he injured his shoulder, requiring surgery, and that he suffered from neck pain and headaches after the car crash.

Product liability attorney's for Muth filed a crashworthiness lawsuit against Ford Motor Company. They alleged that a design defect in the Crown Victoria's roof caused it to crush into the interior upon impact, and strike Muth's head with considerable force. Muth also alleged that the passenger restraint system had been defectively designed. But most of the trial focused on whether Ford should have designed the roof structure to provide better crush protection.

"If a roof crushes substantially during a car crash, due to a failure of the side rails, headers or support pillars, catastrophic injuries can occur," said nationally recognized product defect lawyer, Brian Chase. "Reducing an occupant's survival space often results in the occupant's head impacting some portion of the car causing paralysis, brain damage and sometimes death. There is simply no excuse for designing a roof so not crashworthy that it collapses so easily."

Ford denied liability and countered that while a stronger roof would have been feasible, it would have done little if anything to prevent personal injuries in rollover accidents such as Muth's. Ford further claimed that a replacement windshield compromised the Crown Victoria roof's strength.

Auto product liability attorneys for Muth produced expert witnesses who claimed that by spending less than $30 per vehicle, Ford could have significantly strengthened the car's roof structure, decreasing its tendency to deform during impacts, and reducing the risk of serious passenger injury. Expert witnesses further testified that Ford had resisted attempts made as early as the 1970s by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration that urged the carmaker to strengthen the Crown Victoria's roof.

"Spending an extra $30 per vehicle to make a roof more crashworthy could have saved Barry Muth and his family an incredible amount of heartache," noted nationally recognized auto defect lawyer, John Bisnar. "This is simply another example of Ford's cost-benefit ratio in car design that has resulted in so many preventable tragedies."

A federal appeals court upheld a $8.7 million verdict in favor of the plaintiffs against Ford Motor Company. The appeals court upheld the jury's decision that Ford's argument regarding the windshield's role in the car's structural integrity was "scant at best" and basically immaterial. "The windshield's contribution, if any, to the roof strength was not part of Muth's theory of design defect," the court said.

Muth and his family were awarded the full $8.7 million, including damages for physical pain, future medical expenses, lost retirement benefits, impairment and disfigurement.

While defective product lawsuits like the Muth's and the lawsuits we have filed against Ford will not bring loved ones back or restore them to health, they serve to alert the general public about the dangers of these cars. We also hope that the lawsuit costs help pursued car makers to stop manufacturing cars with weak roofs or at least redesign them to be more crashworthy.

If you or a loved one has suffered serious injuries as the result of a defective auto part or vehicle, contact the experienced California auto products liability attorneys at BISNAR | CHASE for a free consultation. We will use our extensive knowledge and resources to achieve the best possible results for you and your family.

(click on icons for more information)

California Auto Products Liability Lawyer Disclaimer: The Orange County auto products liability, defective auto parts, auto recall, motor vehicle defects, personal injury or other Orange County California legal information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer or attorney client relationship. Any results set forth here were dependent on the facts of that case and the results will differ from case to case. Please contact an Orange County defective auto part lawyer or auto product liability attorney at one of our Southern California law firm offices located in Los Angeles County and Orange County. This web site is not intended to solicit clients for matters outside of the State of California, although we have relationships with attorneys and law firms throughout the United States.

California Personal Injury Attorneys and Southern California Auto Product Liability Lawyers serving all of California including Anaheim, Santa Ana, Irvine, Huntington Beach and Newport Beach.

Don't Wait Until It's Too Late: California Statutes of Limitations

Governmental Claim - 6 months | Personal Injury - 2 years | Minor's Personal Injury - 2 years after minor's 18th birthday | Professional Negligence: 1 Year

The BISNAR | CHASE Personal Injury Attorneys serve all of California, including Orange County, Los Angeles County, Riverside County, San Bernardino County, Ventura County, San Diego County and San Francisco County. We serve Newport Beach, Anaheim, Buena Park, Costa Mesa, Fullerton, Garden Grove, Huntington Beach, Irvine, Lake Forest, Orange, Santa Ana, Tustin, Westminster, Los Angeles, Torrance, West Covina, San Francisco, Riverside, San Bernardino, Victorville, Ventura and San Diego. In addition, we represent clients in other states through our associations with local law firms. Through the local firm, we will be admitted to practice law in their state, pro hac vice, meaning "for this particular occasion." When in our client's interest, we employ the local law firm (at no additional cost to our client) to assist us with routine court appearances and discovery proceedings to more efficiently pursue our client's cause.

©1999- BISNAR | CHASE LLP Personal Injury Lawyers - All rights reserved. Locations: Orange County Personal Injury Lawyers - 1301 Dove St., Suite 120, Newport Beach, CA 92660; Los Angeles Personal Injury Lawyers - 1111 South Grand Ave., Suite 101, Los Angeles, CA 90015; San Francisco Personal Injury Lawyers - 5139 Geary Boulevard, San Francisco, CA 92118

Website, SEO and Legal Internet Marketing by  SLS Consulting

Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Sitemap | Abogados para Accidentes de Auto - Se Habla Español

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

Google Analytics Alternative